The main template has a line which calls up the Rebol file calendar.r I changed this occurrance to call up a revised file called calendaral.r You can see that I changed a number from a block of script which composes a calendar block of 31 days. The number I changed is "1", after repeated tries to get the first row of the table of the monthly calendar to start the week off on a Sunday, the only number I was able to result in this was zero (0). I also discovered that removing the text "- 1" altogether, as opposed to changing the digit from 1 to 0 also accomplished my objective.

In the calendar above, the first occurance of the year sequence `2 6 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3` is the year 2100 would fall on if the millennium year was not an issue with leap year. Instead, the 28-year cycle takes over from this sequence:

`2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2100]`

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2101]<-------------

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2102] |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2103] |

5 2 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [LEAP YEAR] <-------- |

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2105] | |

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2106] | |

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2107] | |

7 4 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [LEAP YEAR] | |

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2109] | |\\

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2110] | | \\

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2111] | | \\

2 6 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [LEAP YEAR] | | \\

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2113] | | \\

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2114] | | \\

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2115] | | (28yr sequence)

4 1 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [LEAP YEAR] | | /

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2117] | | /

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2118] | | /

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2119] | | /

6 3 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [LEAP YEAR] | | /

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2121] | |/

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2122] | |

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2123] | |

1 5 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [LEAP YEAR] | |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2125] | |

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2126] | |

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2127] | |

3 7 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [LEAP YEAR] | |

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2129]»---------|---

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2130] |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2131] |

5 2 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6

is a multiple of 400, then

chances are good that it will be

a leap year (February contains

29 days); hence, if a millennium

year is not a multiple of 400,

February will have 28 days and

that year will not (should not)

be a "leap year".

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2101]<-------------

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2102] |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2103] |

5 2 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [LEAP YEAR] <-------- |

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2105] | |

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2106] | |

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2107] | |

7 4 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [LEAP YEAR] | |

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2109] | |\\

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2110] | | \\

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2111] | | \\

2 6 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [LEAP YEAR] | | \\

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2113] | | \\

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2114] | | \\

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2115] | | (28yr sequence)

4 1 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [LEAP YEAR] | | /

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2117] | | /

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2118] | | /

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2119] | | /

6 3 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [LEAP YEAR] | | /

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2121] | |/

3 7 7 4 2 6 4 1 5 3 7 5 [year 2122] | |

2 6 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [year 2123] | |

1 5 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [LEAP YEAR] | |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2125] | |

5 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 7 5 2 7 [year 2126] | |

4 1 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6 [year 2127] | |

3 7 6 3 1 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 [LEAP YEAR] | |

1 5 5 2 7 4 2 6 3 1 5 3 [year 2129]»---------|---

7 4 4 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 2 [year 2130] |

6 3 3 7 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 1 [year 2131] |

5 2 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 4 1 6

**Break in sequence! ---**__Remember__, if a millennium yearis a multiple of 400, then

chances are good that it will be

a leap year (February contains

29 days); hence, if a millennium

year is not a multiple of 400,

February will have 28 days and

that year will not (should not)

be a "leap year".